A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
✓Claimant Mauricio Luna Bisbal Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide RECHAZAR, por falta de pertinencia, las recusaciones presentadas por los ciudadanos Mauricio Luna Bisbal y Seuxis Paucias Hernández Solarte en contra de los magistrados Carlos Bernal Pulido y Antonio Lizarazo Ocampo, dentro del expediente D-11653 que dio origen a la Sentencia C-332/17.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por falta de pertinencia la recusacion presentada por el ciudadano Mauricio Luna Bisbal contra los Magistrados Carlos Bernal Pulido y Antonio Lizarazo Ocampo, dentro del expediente D-11653, que dio origen a la Sentencia C-332 de 2017.
- SEGUNDO. RECHAZAR por falta de pertinencia las recusacion presentada por el ciudadano Seuxis Paucias Hernandez Solarte contra el Magistrado Carlos Bernal Pulido, dentro del expediente D-11653, que dio origen a la Sentencia C-332 de 2017.
- TERCERO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.